These past Temporal modalities help express your current feelings about past decisions (or other actions). …to form these past modalities, use can, would or should followed by have followed by the past participle verb. Use have for all pronouns; never use has or had to form the past modality.

Could it be grammatically correct?

In this case, « may have » indicates that the effect is still present. If the study had ended, « could have been » would have been more appropriate.If the research is still ongoing, the possible impact is correct.

Can I use the past tense?

no past tensebut could have followed by the past participle is used to refer to something in the past that was not true, or could have been true: I could have been killed.

Could it have been or could it have been?

maybe Common misspellings of verb phrases can be. Most native English speakers use possible acronyms in everyday speech. This pronunciation omits the accented H sound that distinguishes the familiarity of ambiguity in spoken English.

What tense will it be?

Another third conditional tense: « Would have »

The « if » clause paired with « would have » is in perfect past tense. To sound more natural, native English speakers often shorten « would have » to « would’ve ». Using « would’ve » sounds much more natural in most situations.

SHOULD | WILL | COULD’VE – full syntax and usage

28 related questions found

Would it be or would it be?

could have – was – was – was – probably was. Please explain all possible forms. would have been expressing an imaginary situation, talking about something that didn’t happen, using the present perfect simple tense. This is called a past condition.

Will and would have been?

What is the difference between « originally » and « originally » ? answer: « Would have » with the main verb. When you see « will have » in a sentence, it means that the action didn’t actually happen because something else didn’t happen first.

Will have or will have?

When people write would of, should of, could of, will of, or math of, they usually confuse the verb have with the preposition of. so would of is would have, could of is could have, should of is should have, will of is will have, and might of is might have: I would have liked to come earlier but I got stuck at work.

Could it have been a sentence?

If he hadn’t driven it into the lake last week, he’d owned that car since he was a teenager. I can eat a lot of good dinners in my life, if I were a better cook. I have eaten many good dinners in my life.

Can it be useful?

1: could have + past participle representation possible in the past, or you were capable of doing something in the past, but you didn’t. (See also Ability Modality.) I could have stayed up late, but I decided to go to bed earlier. They could have won the game, but they didn’t try hard enough.

Can and can syntax?

Can, like can and would, yes used to ask polite questions, but can is only used to ask permission to do or say something (« Can I borrow your car? » « Can I get you something to drink? »). could is the past tense of can, but it has other uses as well – that’s where the confusion comes in.

Will it be in the past tense?

Technically speaking, will is the past tense of willbut it is an auxiliary verb with many uses, some of which even indicate the present tense.

Can it be used for grammar?

Can +have – means a possible action that was not performed by the subject in the past Example: She could have gone to the party, but she’s not interested. « Been » is the perfect tense for « am/is/are ».

Can there be a correct one?

« Could have been » and « could have been » are both wrong. it should be »could have » and « would have ». « Could » needs to be followed by an infinitive. « Have » is the infinitive here, not the present tense.

Does it make no sense?

no way Some things were impossible in the past. Example: She couldn’t have been on that flight because I just saw her at work.

When does it have to be used?

We can use must have to to indicate that we draw conclusions based on what we know about the current situation, and must have to draw conclusions about the past: […] – John was not at home when I went. He must have gone out unexpectedly.

Should there be a sentence?

« he should have bandages« . We should have had more. I should have had better game management. City should have had three penalties.

Did it make sense?

have been past perfect form of have When it is used as the main verb to describe our experiences and actions. We use the past perfect tense, Madiini, when we talk about the past and want to look back at an earlier past time.

What does it possibly mean?

There may have been a car accident. This has two different meanings, doesn’t it?Use at the beginning of the sentence in question may indicate that this is Accidents may have occurred in the past, but that certainly never was. If he bought a lottery ticket, he might win the lottery.

What mistake did you identify in the following sentence I haven’t been there before?

Rule: Use was not or were not to negate adjectives and nouns. Incorrect: Never been there before. Correct: I haven’t been there before.

Would it have been Vs?

We use would have in the past conditional to talk about something that didn’t happen: if he saw you, he would be very angry. never used. This is not correct.

I know VS if I know?

The correct way to say it is to use the past perfect in the « if » clause and the conditional perfect in the « then » clause: Correct: If I know you’re going to the cinema, [then] i will go too. . . Incorrect: If I knew you were going to the movies, I would too.

Will it be or would it have been?

this will be building Consider the possibility that Henry might reinvent himself. The original structure suggested that the speaker was looking back on Henry’s life, but there was no possibility of change. It’s really just a matter of nuance and the speaker’s point of view.

Will I be sentenced?

For example, you might say, « i will be there for your birthday party But I was lying in bed with the flu. « It shows that you intend to go there, but something appears to prevent you from going there. If another circumstance or condition is met, the situation will be different.

Should there be or should there be?

Modal auxiliary verbs should have a past form, should have, used before the past participle of a verb. When using this past form, should and have is…